atheism might more correctly be defined as an affront to logic or reason judging from most of the responses I have seen
again darwinning
all men are mortal
socrates is a man
therefore socrates is mortal
that is a basic argument. It uses only claims and conclusions. It demonstrates nothing. it is neither inherently true or false. It is simply logically valid. It is an argument; it proves nothing.
again darwinning
all men are mortal
socrates is a man
therefore socrates is mortal
that is a basic argument. It uses only claims and conclusions. It demonstrates nothing. it is neither inherently true or false. It is simply logically valid. It is an argument; it proves nothing.
