Divergent sexualities

[FrustratedFool]

A) So you don't think love is a feeling, or even an idea now, but an interaction. If so we are just using words differently. I've been talking of love here as an emotion/feeling.

Romantic love is an emotional interaction between two (at least ) entities 

B) Why do you define sexuality that way? It seems arbitrary.

Because all sexualities are predicated on interactions between entities OS is the only one that doesn't comport to this thus I simply can't regard it in the same light. 

C) OK, so all false ideas need therapy if possible. That's really weird thing for a mental health professionals to say, I think. But OK. That's your opinion. Do you need therapy, or are all your ideas true?

Therapy is ideal for dealing with falsehoods but other falsehoods are frankly beyond mere therapy. At the moment I'm pretty confident my ideas are true though I could be wrong and I have been wrong before though I tend to toss false idea's aside after all why would I want false beliefs?

A) That's a semantic debate then. I'm talking about love as an emotion.

B) Sexuality seems to me to just state who/what someone finds sexually attractive. A gay guy is still gay if they never have any interaction with anyone whatsoever based purely on what they find attractive. Again, this is a semantic difference.

C) I find the idea that every false belief requires therapy to be weird. But that's just an opinion you have. I don't share it.