RE: Divergent sexualities
November 2, 2023 at 6:27 pm
(This post was last modified: November 2, 2023 at 6:27 pm by The Architect Of Fate.)
Quote:A) That's a semantic debate then. I'm talking about love as an emotion.So am I but in the context of an interaction between entities. Not sure what's semantic about that
Quote:B) Sexuality seems to me to just state who/what someone finds sexually attractive. A gay guy is still gay if they never have any interaction with anyone whatsoever based purely on what they find attractive. Again, this is a semantic difference.Nope, Sexuality even in your example is based on an attraction to entities and an interaction between entities. The gay's gayness is still an attraction to entities and is based on an interaction between entities. Not sure what's semantic about that
Quote:C) I find the idea that every false belief requires therapy to be weird. But that's just an opinion you have. I don't share it.I already made it clear not every false belief can be solved by therapy.
"Change was inevitable"
Nemo sicut deus debet esse!
![[Image: Canada_Flag.jpg?v=1646203843]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=cdn.shopify.com%2Fs%2Ffiles%2F1%2F0630%2F5310%2F3332%2Fproducts%2FCanada_Flag.jpg%3Fv%3D1646203843)
“No matter what men think, abortion is a fact of life. Women have always had them; they always have and they always will. Are they going to have good ones or bad ones? Will the good ones be reserved for the rich, while the poor women go to quacks?”
–SHIRLEY CHISHOLM
Nemo sicut deus debet esse!
“No matter what men think, abortion is a fact of life. Women have always had them; they always have and they always will. Are they going to have good ones or bad ones? Will the good ones be reserved for the rich, while the poor women go to quacks?”
–SHIRLEY CHISHOLM
