We're not shielding the many rabbit but the singular that covers all major faiths. By saying the singular is everything religious is off track. You keep trying to expand my statements into something different and this does the opposite of helping rational thought. ie respectfully, you need Address the point precisely. Forgive me if I misunderstand you.
You're (not singularly) obsessed with the conclusive proof of God's existence. This is folly as I've stated very many times here since January. Play all the tricks you like with the concept because it will get you no-where as the evidence available to both of us is identical. It's not winnable.
To take us back to the beginning: The hard fact is that the concept exists which denies empirical proof. I'm afraid that's just got to be a thorn in science's ass, and it's going to have to live with it, unless people with power wipe it from history.
You're (not singularly) obsessed with the conclusive proof of God's existence. This is folly as I've stated very many times here since January. Play all the tricks you like with the concept because it will get you no-where as the evidence available to both of us is identical. It's not winnable.
To take us back to the beginning: The hard fact is that the concept exists which denies empirical proof. I'm afraid that's just got to be a thorn in science's ass, and it's going to have to live with it, unless people with power wipe it from history.
