So, to clarify after this meaningless discussion about the definition of gravity, we have established that gravity is a force - that force does not have effects, but rather is the effect. This would then make consciousness something other than a force, because consciousness does effect objects and is not simply the effect.
Can we get back to the actual discussion?
Blam: can you give me a reference to when amkerman said: "gravity is under the influence of God" which caused you to make the statement: "Why do you have to make the baseless claims like "gravity is under influence of god" or "gravity has consciousness" shit? Really, you challenge me with claims even without slightest evidence?"
Can we get back to the actual discussion?
Blam: can you give me a reference to when amkerman said: "gravity is under the influence of God" which caused you to make the statement: "Why do you have to make the baseless claims like "gravity is under influence of god" or "gravity has consciousness" shit? Really, you challenge me with claims even without slightest evidence?"
Brevity is the soul of wit.