RE: Argument against atheism
December 22, 2011 at 4:40 pm
(This post was last modified: December 22, 2011 at 4:43 pm by Darwinning.)
(December 22, 2011 at 4:31 pm)Perhaps Wrote: I suppose my thought process is inclining me to think in terms of biological evolution. The perfection of senses and consciousness would then mean both omniscience and omnipotence. To end evolution there would also have to be no more conflict - meaning that only one being exists. The one I couldn't think of yet is omnipresent but I think it would stem from only one being existing.
I think you need to study evolution some more. Evolution does not 'perfect senses'. Evolution does only what I described: favor things that procreate. It has no 'objective' sense of what is 'better'.
One being in existence would be one way to end evolution, yes. There would be no conflict, but more importantly, no procreation.
(December 22, 2011 at 4:36 pm)Rhythm Wrote: Or perhaps in the end, survival favors complete ignorance and inability, selecting speed and fool-proofing of reproduction over all else.
Someone's gone and done made one a dem moving pictures 'bout dat!
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0387808/