(January 15, 2024 at 8:42 pm)The Grand Nudger Wrote: I'd prefer you didn't share anything from magic book - personally.Sure, no problem. You admit that I’m right on that (one little) point, then? Cool.
(January 15, 2024 at 8:42 pm)The Grand Nudger Wrote: If god is personal and intervening, then anthropomorphizing divinity is not a bug, it's a feature. You can't take someone to task for something you positively affirm yourself“take someone to task”? You’ll have to show me where I did that. The only place I can think of that’s close is when I said
(January 15, 2024 at 7:50 pm)SimpleCaveman Wrote: At the same time, as before, God is beyond, or above, gender. The concept is only an anthropomorphization(?). God is represented as both a father and a mother in the Bible. It is the characteristics of fatherhood and motherhood that are more representative of God.Saying that the concept is anthropomorphizing is, again, recognizing reality, not taking to task.