Dotard,
I think your missing the memo that's been going around. You're an Atheist. We are very different kinds of theists. We can not show you any 'truth', it is not our responsibility. You want to find god, find her. If not, then don't. Either way, not my problem.
I only can speak for myself, but to rudely ask for 'truth' or 'evidence' is beyond useless. It would appear that one of our camps is crazy, seeing the world as it clearly is not. Until we have a fully factual and scientific knowledge of the things beyond this world, we don't know for sure which camp is crazy. So then, lets just discuss other things, that we know we might come to a conclusion with.
Arguing about God will get us no where. I tried it when I first got here.
Just what I think, but Arcanus can answer you if he likes, of course.
Yes Adrian sounded like he wanted badly to classify you as something. Too 'pigeon hole' you. He can be a little... Whats the word? He has yet too meet a creationist who understands evolution... I have yet to meet an atheist who understands the life he was given. Stupid, stupid statements.
Sorry for being an apologist. What is an apologist?
Padraic, I only meant to point out the you said you felt patronized by Arcanus' first post. May be some other did as well, I did not, unimportant though. So based on the assumption that he was patronizing you specifically and on purpose, you patronized him specifically and on purpose. And still spoke as if you were somehow better that himself.
All I am pointing out is that you are acting the same way you accuse him of acting, to justify your actions. If that is a touque (winter hat?) argument so be it, I think it is still valid. I am certainly trying to focus and argue you position, not your self.
I didn't say 'I like you,but'. Nor did I say 'I would like you if you just did this little thing'. I said 'I kind of like you'. You are similar to myself, and I appreciate your wit. I am only disagreeing the content of your post, and enjoy that you shared it in the first place. I am disagreeing, but without syntax it's hard to follow. I am cheerful and conversational when I write. Anyways, I hope I didn't offend you too muc, and I hope you can understand what I meant.
Thanks all.
-Pip
I think your missing the memo that's been going around. You're an Atheist. We are very different kinds of theists. We can not show you any 'truth', it is not our responsibility. You want to find god, find her. If not, then don't. Either way, not my problem.
I only can speak for myself, but to rudely ask for 'truth' or 'evidence' is beyond useless. It would appear that one of our camps is crazy, seeing the world as it clearly is not. Until we have a fully factual and scientific knowledge of the things beyond this world, we don't know for sure which camp is crazy. So then, lets just discuss other things, that we know we might come to a conclusion with.
Arguing about God will get us no where. I tried it when I first got here.
Just what I think, but Arcanus can answer you if he likes, of course.
Yes Adrian sounded like he wanted badly to classify you as something. Too 'pigeon hole' you. He can be a little... Whats the word? He has yet too meet a creationist who understands evolution... I have yet to meet an atheist who understands the life he was given. Stupid, stupid statements.
Sorry for being an apologist. What is an apologist?
Padraic, I only meant to point out the you said you felt patronized by Arcanus' first post. May be some other did as well, I did not, unimportant though. So based on the assumption that he was patronizing you specifically and on purpose, you patronized him specifically and on purpose. And still spoke as if you were somehow better that himself.
All I am pointing out is that you are acting the same way you accuse him of acting, to justify your actions. If that is a touque (winter hat?) argument so be it, I think it is still valid. I am certainly trying to focus and argue you position, not your self.
I didn't say 'I like you,but'. Nor did I say 'I would like you if you just did this little thing'. I said 'I kind of like you'. You are similar to myself, and I appreciate your wit. I am only disagreeing the content of your post, and enjoy that you shared it in the first place. I am disagreeing, but without syntax it's hard to follow. I am cheerful and conversational when I write. Anyways, I hope I didn't offend you too muc, and I hope you can understand what I meant.
Thanks all.
-Pip
