RE: So you believe in evolution..
December 23, 2011 at 1:03 pm
(This post was last modified: December 23, 2011 at 1:14 pm by Jaysyn.)
(December 23, 2011 at 9:37 am)power Wrote:(December 23, 2011 at 9:31 am)Darwinian Wrote: I should give up people.. This is a bit like arguing with a stubborn child about the existence of Santa
You never even began. You brought up two unconvincing cases of vestigial organs..you could try engaging the original post. Not one person has constructed a valid argument supporting macro evolution
Actually Aleialoura did on the very first page of this thread, but you ignored it & kept babbling in typical creationist fashion.
(December 23, 2011 at 10:28 am)power Wrote: Goodnight everyone..hopefully when I return someone will present an argument supporting macroevolution..
for those who keep posting the 29 evidences, here are the 29 refutations http://www.trueorigin.org/theobald1a.asp
Old & outdated, I read the first two pages & gave up. The author hinges his case (against the 29 evidences) on not having found out how rudimentary life originally started on ancient earth. As if not knowing what the first cause was is enough to ignore the mechanism in which evolution takes place. But either way, we can do it in a lab these days. Nice try though. E for effort.
"How is it that a lame man does not annoy us while a lame mind does? Because a lame man recognizes that we are walking straight, while a lame mind says that it is we who are limping." - Pascal
