RE: Argument against atheism
December 23, 2011 at 6:59 pm
(This post was last modified: December 23, 2011 at 7:03 pm by Perhaps.)
Interesting, as you can easily see, as soon as you answer 'no' to one question the proof stops.
What is the field of science contained within?
What do scientific assertions verified by evidence determine?
Again with the editing
.
I provided a proof of why evidence is contained with the processes of reason and logic. The fuzzy concepts are the base assumptions of existence, which are necessary premises for the rest of the proof. It is a loop to demonstrate the cyclical nature of logical proofs.
What is the field of science contained within?
What do scientific assertions verified by evidence determine?
(December 23, 2011 at 6:42 pm)Rhythm Wrote: Truth, as a concept that you are here discussing, can be said to exist. Anything beyond that is an argument of definitions, which is exactly what I began this whole thing by criticizing. Lemme make sure I have this straight. You choose a fuzzy concept, and then craft a looping rant (with some fun misconceptions thrown in just to make it seem as though the begining and end had something to do with the middle).....in a conversation about armchair philosophy?
Again with the editing
. I provided a proof of why evidence is contained with the processes of reason and logic. The fuzzy concepts are the base assumptions of existence, which are necessary premises for the rest of the proof. It is a loop to demonstrate the cyclical nature of logical proofs.
Brevity is the soul of wit.
