Argument against atheism

[Perhaps]

People, observations, and the scientific method.

(Trying to be spartan without losing it)

Then it must be assumed, outside of science, that people, observations, and the scientific method exist. This is the axiom I am referring to, which cannot be proven, it is assumed to be true.

If science disproves that one of its prerequisites for existence actual exists then it disproves its own existence, which is impossible.

Sorry for the late response, was eating dinner.