RE: Argument against atheism
December 23, 2011 at 10:10 pm
(This post was last modified: December 23, 2011 at 10:12 pm by Perhaps.)
(December 23, 2011 at 10:03 pm)Rhythm Wrote: Why? -Results.
Why?
(December 23, 2011 at 10:03 pm)Rhythm Wrote: Why? -Why what, why doesn't science prove anything? Because thats not what it was designed to do. Why is it useful in producing results if everything were illusory? That's inexplicable isn't it? (Which is why I dont argue for that proposition) Nevertheless, it is, as the results are the very evidence for it's effectiveness.
Why?
(December 23, 2011 at 10:03 pm)Rhythm Wrote: Why? -Again, that the evidence that leads us to conclude this produces results, the argument that you proposes leads to exactly nothing but a thought, not even remotely useful or demonstrable.
Why?
(December 23, 2011 at 10:03 pm)Rhythm Wrote: Why? -Because you seem to have a fundamental misunderstanding of what science is and does?
Why?
(December 23, 2011 at 10:03 pm)Rhythm Wrote: Why? _Now this one is just you being a douche, answering a direct question with "Why?" as though it even formed a coherent thought. Next.
Why?
(December 23, 2011 at 10:03 pm)Rhythm Wrote: Why? -Another worthless question meant to appear as honest inquiry...there isn't even anything to why in this one, as it is an explanation of "why" already.
Why?
(December 23, 2011 at 10:03 pm)Rhythm Wrote: Why? -Because our assumptions have led to unproductive wastes of time and been shown to be very flawed many many times.
Why?
There will be a finite regress as I continue to ask 'why?' until you either make an assumption or assert ignorance.
Brevity is the soul of wit.
