Welsh u just mad bro. Don't be so angry bro. Bro. BRO!
I know what movie I was quoting from. I did not bastardize it. It is quoted correctly. It's funny that you attack my use of the quote... Telling. You just made up a fallacy (or more likely stole the term from someone else who made it up) of "incomprehensible deity". That's like calling "infinity" a fallacy merely because it can't be comprehended.
Honestly welsch you started off (58 pages ago) so well but since then it has become readily apparent that you are simply a fanboy of atheism. Science does not try to verify God because God has not been acceptably operationally defined in scientific terms. Simple as that. Not because there is nothing to test, but because science doesn't know what to test or how to test it. As i have stated before, as science progresses to the point where it better understands consciousness I expect that to change.
I know what movie I was quoting from. I did not bastardize it. It is quoted correctly. It's funny that you attack my use of the quote... Telling. You just made up a fallacy (or more likely stole the term from someone else who made it up) of "incomprehensible deity". That's like calling "infinity" a fallacy merely because it can't be comprehended.
Honestly welsch you started off (58 pages ago) so well but since then it has become readily apparent that you are simply a fanboy of atheism. Science does not try to verify God because God has not been acceptably operationally defined in scientific terms. Simple as that. Not because there is nothing to test, but because science doesn't know what to test or how to test it. As i have stated before, as science progresses to the point where it better understands consciousness I expect that to change.