RE: How seculars are exploiting the youth
December 26, 2011 at 4:07 pm
(This post was last modified: December 26, 2011 at 4:13 pm by amkerman.)
1. You missed the point completely
2. I didn't validate your previous post with a response bc if you had actually read my post, and then read your own, and were able to comprehend English, you would realize that your "points" did not respond to anything I said.
Claiming faith is silly and then asking rhetorically what good reason there is to have faith is a loaded question. If you arent going to be reasonable, I'm not going to respond. Maybe if you take an SAT prep course you'd be able to realize the multitude of unfounded assumptions you make when you type your defensive drivel.
I'm not here to converse with the willfully ignorant.
"that's complete bullshit." is not an argument. The sentence following misrepresented what I said.
Second "argument" was simply a loaded question. You were using circular reasoning.
Third point. You agreed with me then continued to add rhetoric at the end to attack me.
Fourth point: "inane waste of words"... My thoughts exactly.
Fitfth point: "every is born an atheist... Atheism predates consciousness... More ad nominal attacks"... Everyone is born without a working knowledge of physics, so physics isn't real... Really, atheism predates consciousness? So before humans were conscious they were able to form beliefs? Interesting I did not know that. You must be some kind of Rhode Scholar or something...
* there are typos in my above post. I realize this.
2. I didn't validate your previous post with a response bc if you had actually read my post, and then read your own, and were able to comprehend English, you would realize that your "points" did not respond to anything I said.
Claiming faith is silly and then asking rhetorically what good reason there is to have faith is a loaded question. If you arent going to be reasonable, I'm not going to respond. Maybe if you take an SAT prep course you'd be able to realize the multitude of unfounded assumptions you make when you type your defensive drivel.
I'm not here to converse with the willfully ignorant.
"that's complete bullshit." is not an argument. The sentence following misrepresented what I said.
Second "argument" was simply a loaded question. You were using circular reasoning.
Third point. You agreed with me then continued to add rhetoric at the end to attack me.
Fourth point: "inane waste of words"... My thoughts exactly.
Fitfth point: "every is born an atheist... Atheism predates consciousness... More ad nominal attacks"... Everyone is born without a working knowledge of physics, so physics isn't real... Really, atheism predates consciousness? So before humans were conscious they were able to form beliefs? Interesting I did not know that. You must be some kind of Rhode Scholar or something...
* there are typos in my above post. I realize this.
