(December 27, 2011 at 6:48 pm)Perhaps Wrote: I am defending my hypothesis. The fact that science works, does not change the fact that it is induced.So? What's wrong with inductive reasoning?
Quote:It is an assumption which is verified with evidence. It's stength is that it is meant to be criticized, no argument there, but do not state that it determines truths or facts, unless you specify that those truths and facts are relative to the time and knowledge available.So what if it is?
I don't give two fucks about the problem of induction if we discover more about our reality through observation like this item of news for example:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-16267625