Hello soulcalm17

[soulcalm17]

About “the God proposal” and materialism or naturalism.
It has long been the case among atheists that they contrast the naturalistic way of phenomena with the absence of God's activity. If a phenomenon can be explained scientifically, then there is no God's activity/no God. This is a proposition that is not based on the many phenomena that occur in the universe itself.
In the universe, we a will find a lot of dualism. The dualism I mean is that there is a a will and mind (which are invisible), but there is also material (which is visible) as an object where we see the effects of a will and mind that occurred.
Continue here:

---

I will give an example:
In the universe, there are humans. And in every human body there are many materials consisting of body organs (which come from cells or cell tissue). Everything becomes one integrated system.
But in every human being, there is also consciousness. This awareness can give rise to the a will and mind in every human being. When we are anxious, our brain releases stress hormones, such as adrenaline, and cortisol. As a result, our heart beats faster and pumps blood faster. But when we decide not to worry anymore, these hormones decrease, and our heart rate slows down and we become calm.
Pay attention to this fact. It turns out there is a phenomenon, where the attributes of a mind (i.e anxiety) can regulate the flow of matter from our body (i.e the brain releases the hormones adrenaline and cortisol). Likewise, the will (when deciding not to worry anymore) can reduce these hormones and return the heart rate to normal.
From this simple fact, we can conclude that mind and a will (which we cannot see) exist, and can influence the movement of matter. And the movement of matter that occurs from one of the decisions of the mind and a will is always the same (for example, when anxious, the brain always releases the hormones adrenaline and cortisol). So, it could also be called a law of nature.
We cannot simply propose a naturalistic explanation that the brain releases the hormones adrenaline and cortisol, and the heart suddenly beats faster. Only natural laws occurred. There is no mind or a will behind that reality. While in fact it is clear that in reality there are mind and a will.
This of course happens a lot in all living creatures.
However, atheists, when explaining about basic particles, do not want to admit the possibility that there is a a will and mind behind these basic particles. The weird thing is, according to them, these objects are not living creatures, so they do not have a will or mind, but somehow, they can move.
Likewise when they explain large-scale phenomena, such as stars and planets. They assumed that there was nothing behind that push the stars. They move themselves based on natural laws. And the low entropy that occurred is not the result of the entity behind it that doing it on purpose. But by chance, it gave rise to conditions suitable for life.
In fact, in the micro universe (in the human body when humans decide not to worry), low entropy comes from the mind which causes stress hormones to decrease and slow down the previously fast heart rate. So that all body metabolism runs normally again. So, mind (which are invisible) can create “low entropy”.
This is what differentiates theists from atheists. I can validly, based on existing empirical events in nature, say that there is a mind and a will behind the universe. I also have no problem saying that both normal natural events and abnormal natural events are definitely influenced by the mind and a will behind the phenomenon. Because a will and mind always have visible effects on matter. There are examples in the universe (i.e in human body) that mind and a will can influence matters. It’s not superstitious.
Meanwhile, atheists still insist on denying the existence of mind and a wills behind the universe. They also assume that there is no mind and a will in every part of the universe. So everything is considered to have its own properties and move itself. In my opinion, this is the same as them believing in magic, which of course doesn't make sense.

---