Ignosticism

[KichigaiNeko]

Apart from the obvious the reality is undefinable, and yes I do remember that spiritual stuff it's on par with positivism an all other odiocy that seems to be still lingering even today, it all comes from the mind, just in different names. Every mind will have a point of view, since everybody's mind represent a point in space time. So you are better off dropping the whole idea and stick to fact, and please don't ask what are the fact. it's not doing much for your intellectual stance.

But my dear I am authentic..... and so do not need you approval or disapproval or opinion in any way.

So far you have argued nothing and have gotten yourself lost in philosophy and mind fucking. Just what is your point??

Where are you?

What time is it??

Authenticity is originality, you are far from original. Mind can never be original since it is always old. Mind is always old and the truth is always new, always remember this, it will help you to graduate from it.

Then you are not 'old' if you were you would realise that there is nothing"new"

Where are you??

What time is it?

That's we're you are wrong, which comes as no surprise since you are mind orientated hence the reason why you repeating yourself like a parrot. You cannot see the new through regurgitating the old. Since you cling to mind for identity you miss, each morning the sun rises or should i say comes round it is new. And since you don't know where i am and what time it is i will tell. I am here and the time is now.

Really?? How absolutely omnipotent of you to know what I do and do not. Or have you been reading 'Thief of Time' - Terry Pratchett ??

Ignosticism or igtheism is the theological position that every other theological position (including agnosticism) assumes too much about the concept of God and many other theological concepts. The word "ignosticism" was coined by Sherwin Wine, a rabbi and a founding figure of Humanistic Judaism.
It can be defined as encompassing two related views about the existence of God:
The view that a coherent definition of God must be presented before the question of the existence of god can be meaningfully discussed. Furthermore, if that definition is unfalsifiable, the ignostic takes the theological noncognitivist position that the question of the existence of God (per that definition) is meaningless. In this case, the concept of God is not considered meaningless; the term "God" is considered meaningless.
The second view is synonymous with theological noncognitivism, and skips the step of first asking "What is meant by 'God'?" before proclaiming the original question "Does God exist?" as meaningless.
Some philosophers have seen ignosticism as a variation of agnosticism or atheism,[1] while others have considered it to be distinct. An ignostic maintains that they cannot even say whether he/she is a theist or an atheist until a sufficient definition of theism is put forth.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ignosticism

What has the above got to do with your pov??

Where are you?? (You are here)

What time is it? (It is now)

So much for your infantile learning little one

---

You're authentically bat shit crazy, of that, I'm sure.

Who Me??

Why thankyou Alei!! Nicest thing anyone has said to me lately (in the past 5 minutes)

Actually I prefer psyco-biatch...