Artificially Interpreted

[Thumpalumpacus]

It's the details that matter. That's where AI actually sucks the most.

Do yourselves a favor, kids: trust your own brains and your own learning. Learn how to grow vegetables, repair an engine, distill water, build something ... AI is about outsourcing thinking. What person in their right mind wants to do that?

Read a fucking book already.

Hell, even with that, I specified that it was supposed to be the Drive version of Ryan Gosling, and for some reason, it came out with the La La Land version. Plus wardrobe elements from a bunch of characters.



This would make some more sense if they just decided they weren't going to do copyrighted characters, but when you make a mistake like that AND you've got as much of the world's art as you can grab at your fingertips, it's safe to assume that you suck.

It's also safe to assume that many folks aren't informed. AI some fiction all you want. Use your AI to "write" books or "compose" music. But when it comes to history and factual knowledge, AI is positively dangerous, given the general ignorance o the viewing public.

The fact that I could not tell who is and isn't Ryan Gosling in a fictional movie, well, what does that matter? But if AI starts citing "sources" like David Irving or Erich von Daniken -- and that's only a matter of time -- well, you're still going to be relying on the intelligence of the general public; and it's much easier to create bullshit than debunk it, especially when you're creating at the speed of computing.