RE: Artificially Interpreted
August 15, 2024 at 1:14 am
(This post was last modified: August 15, 2024 at 1:15 am by Thumpalumpacus.)
(August 15, 2024 at 12:35 am)Rev. Rye Wrote: In fairness, AI seems more likely to just create random sources than cite people like David Irving.
https://apnews.com/article/artificial-in...397aef381c
In fairness, artificial sources might be better than David Irving. But the programming that drives them doesn't discriminate much, does it.
"It makes shit up on its but doesn't crib known liars" is not really a strong recommendation.