RE: The Question of Why
December 29, 2011 at 4:26 pm
(This post was last modified: December 29, 2011 at 4:27 pm by Welsh cake.)
(December 28, 2011 at 11:46 pm)Perhaps Wrote: Since you're so adamant about me responding.Because its the polite and decent thing to do, yes.
Quote:I specified in my hypothesis, which could be seen as being based off of regress argumentIt isn't another form of a regress argument, IT IS the regress argument in question. You don't get to have a -cut off point- where any given proposition no longer requires a justification to prove some arbitrary point. According to the Regress Argument "I don't know, I'm just making an assumption" ALSO requires justification and 'Why?' is asked yet again. Its identified as a never-ending loop for that reason.
Quote:Inductive reasoning is assumption based. You can use any synonym you wish to replace assumption, but it still supports my hypothesis.The Problem of induction dates back to ancient philosophy, it doesn't support or address your 'hypothesis'.
Quote:We justify our assumptions, that doesn't change the fact that they are assumptions. I'm sorry that my hypothesis is a 'childish twat', as you say.Usage of the Regress Argument in an epistemic debate or dispute is childish.