Fuck me are you gona get your arse handed too you.
MIN WHERE ARE YOU.
Have you noticed that not one of the writers were alive during the life of this jesus person.
Even Josephus whose account of jesus is widely accepted to be a later forgery, lived after the time of jesus. Being born at least 4 years after the supposed incidents came to a conclusion.
But there is a further problem to your argument.
It is possible, (although not at all proved) that jesus the man existed.
So fucking what.
You'd still have to prove that jesus was god.
You do know that many of the branch davidians still that David Koresh was the lamb of god. Belief is funy like that, people are loathe to let it go despite the evidence to the contrary.
MIN WHERE ARE YOU.
Have you noticed that not one of the writers were alive during the life of this jesus person.
Even Josephus whose account of jesus is widely accepted to be a later forgery, lived after the time of jesus. Being born at least 4 years after the supposed incidents came to a conclusion.
Quote:In The Witnesses to the Historicity of Jesus (1912), Arthur Drews wrote, "In the edition of Origen published by the Benedictines it is said that there was no mention of Jesus at all in Josephus before the time of Eusebius (about 300 A.D., Ecclesiast. Hist., 1, 11). Moreover, in the sixteenth century Vossius had a manuscript of the text of Josephus in which there was not a word about Jesus." He believed this was proof that both this passage and the Testimonium Flavianum were interpolations.
But there is a further problem to your argument.
It is possible, (although not at all proved) that jesus the man existed.
So fucking what.
You'd still have to prove that jesus was god.
You do know that many of the branch davidians still that David Koresh was the lamb of god. Belief is funy like that, people are loathe to let it go despite the evidence to the contrary.
You can fix ignorance, you can't fix stupid.
Tinkety Tonk and down with the Nazis.