Quote:The Civil War is perhaps the best example of why progress does not follow from violence.Pretty not being slaves was progress so your points falls hard
Consider the fact that slavery had already been abolished by peaceful means in many other nations. This demonstrates that violence was not a necessary (though certainly justified) condition for abolition. Perhaps more persuasive is the fact that almost no other nation has struggled with the aftermath of abolition more than America. The Civil War paved the way for Southern racism—the lynchings, the inequality, and the discrimination that exists to this day. This seems to me a direct consequence of the violence by which abolition was achieved. Another example is Haiti—no other island in the Carribean has existed with as much stigma and deprivation as Haiti. And this is true despite abolition being universally achieved across the Carribean, though none as violent as Haiti's.
And so, my point stands: Wherever there is a nonviolent alternative, it will outperform the violent one.
"Change was inevitable"
Nemo sicut deus debet esse!
“No matter what men think, abortion is a fact of life. Women have always had them; they always have and they always will. Are they going to have good ones or bad ones? Will the good ones be reserved for the rich, while the poor women go to quacks?”
–SHIRLEY CHISHOLM
Nemo sicut deus debet esse!
“No matter what men think, abortion is a fact of life. Women have always had them; they always have and they always will. Are they going to have good ones or bad ones? Will the good ones be reserved for the rich, while the poor women go to quacks?”
–SHIRLEY CHISHOLM