(December 18, 2024 at 5:28 am)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote:(December 18, 2024 at 4:43 am)TheWhiteMarten Wrote: No - He is not called the "Living God" for no reason, though what life would mean for Him would approach more the Platonian Idealism "form" than the materialistic interpretation of it we as humans are by default locked into.
This sort of thing is likely to get you beaten senseless (metaphorically speaking) by a Nominalist. God botherers glommed on to Platonic Forms as a convenient was to claim that things which don't exist actually do. You ignorant wretch.
Boru
Oh feck, @Belaqua's gonna love that...