(February 10, 2025 at 10:48 am)John 6IX Breezy Wrote:(February 9, 2025 at 10:39 pm)Paleophyte Wrote: No, I've heard it said. That doesn't make it sensible. Much like playing 20 questions with somebody who insists that they're thinking of something that's entirely animal, entirely mineral, and entirely vegetable.
Because animal and vegetable (plant) are mutually exclusive categories; they're both at the same level of classification (i.e. taxonomical kingdoms). But something can be entirely animal and entirely organic because these exist at separate levels.
For Jesus to be unable to be entirely man and entirely God you would have to argue that humanity and divinity exist at the same level of classification, that they're members of the same category, which no one believes.
Really? Google "Divine Antonym". My first three hits were "mortal", "human", and "mundane". So clearly there are people who believe that humans aren't gods and gods aren't human. Imagine that.
BTW, it seems like you don't understand how classification works. I'm pretty sure that the domestic housecat isn't an evergreen despite the fact that they're on different taxonomic levels.
