(June 6, 2025 at 4:29 pm)SubtleVirtue Wrote:(June 6, 2025 at 12:22 pm)Mister Agenda Wrote: If this is regarding your proof from observation, it seems to be a string of assertions followed by a loosely-connected conclusion. You should get rid of any premises not needed to reach the conclusion.
For instance 'monism exists' doesn't seem to add anything to the argument. If you were trying to assert that monism is the case and dualism is not, that ought to be the conclusion of a different argument. And I say that as a monist.
(10) F; "energy exists"
(11) F; "every experiment ever constructed shows that everything is made of energy"
(12) (10,11) C; "monism exists"
12 is a natural deduction from 10 and 11
The reason I prove monism... is to demonstrate there is but one supreme God.
(1) Listing random words
(2) Isn't
(3) Proof!
