Why do American Atheists Believe in the Constitution?
July 1, 2025 at 9:45 am
(This post was last modified: July 1, 2025 at 10:17 am by awty.)
My primary argument is that the Three-part Separation Theory was underdeveloped and, inevitably, inaccurately deployed throughout the American charter system.
The starting point for understanding the perpetually cycling problems of the three-branch governing system is that all of the executive power is in the executive branch, and the subsequent security departments lack an orderly organization of that power – just about every president reorganizes the branch to accommodate their agendas. The partisan problem is because the legislative assemblies are generally commissioned, publicly elected, and unsupervised. The judicial problem is because the administrative powers are distributed among the three branches, and the political contest in the legislatures stabilized into its erroneous duopoly; ultimately, disseminating partisanship into society, including the judicial servants.
The absolute truth is that a three-branch government only prevents any one person from ascending to a dictatorship. The inconvenient truth is that neither the separation nor the formulation of checks on power prevents corruption or controls the quality of the inevitable oligarchy formed by the principal officials in the government. The problem is not because the establishment of justice is a balanced altruistic design that is vulnerable to nefarious politicians, bureaucrats, pundits, and activists. The problem is that the checks and balances cannot be reliably constructed for a three-branch government, and that adversely affects everything. It is the proverbial box of rules that forms our understanding of the system of justice. There is no calibration standard for measuring or comprehending the balance of government powers. “Power grab,” is the scholars’ unwitting confirmation of this inadequacy and, “Co-equal branches,” is another patronizing ideal that hides the fact that they have never properly critiqued the Three-part Separation Theory.
Over two hundred years of operations, and the checks and balances that are supposed to prevent corruption or lead to corrective amendments, still yield waste, fraud, and abuse, accumulating a national debt of tens of trillions of dollars.
The starting point for understanding the perpetually cycling problems of the three-branch governing system is that all of the executive power is in the executive branch, and the subsequent security departments lack an orderly organization of that power – just about every president reorganizes the branch to accommodate their agendas. The partisan problem is because the legislative assemblies are generally commissioned, publicly elected, and unsupervised. The judicial problem is because the administrative powers are distributed among the three branches, and the political contest in the legislatures stabilized into its erroneous duopoly; ultimately, disseminating partisanship into society, including the judicial servants.
The absolute truth is that a three-branch government only prevents any one person from ascending to a dictatorship. The inconvenient truth is that neither the separation nor the formulation of checks on power prevents corruption or controls the quality of the inevitable oligarchy formed by the principal officials in the government. The problem is not because the establishment of justice is a balanced altruistic design that is vulnerable to nefarious politicians, bureaucrats, pundits, and activists. The problem is that the checks and balances cannot be reliably constructed for a three-branch government, and that adversely affects everything. It is the proverbial box of rules that forms our understanding of the system of justice. There is no calibration standard for measuring or comprehending the balance of government powers. “Power grab,” is the scholars’ unwitting confirmation of this inadequacy and, “Co-equal branches,” is another patronizing ideal that hides the fact that they have never properly critiqued the Three-part Separation Theory.
Over two hundred years of operations, and the checks and balances that are supposed to prevent corruption or lead to corrective amendments, still yield waste, fraud, and abuse, accumulating a national debt of tens of trillions of dollars.
