Why do American Atheists Believe in the Constitution?

[Fireball]

OP is trolling, looking for a fight. Move along.

I am not a troll. I am trying to advance American atheists from the Constitutional dogma that they share with the theists.
I am not looking for a fight. I am looking for agreement. You are looking to advance your standing in the oligarchy of this forum's community.

So I'm guessing mom and dad couldn't get enough together for summer camp, so you've got a boring summer ahead?

I suggest nature walks or the local library

This is an example of trolling. This shithead is not considered a troll because he has advanced his standing in the oligarchy of this forum's community - you are friends, and have the privilege of challenging newbies, like me.

By the way. The Dewey Decimal and Library of Congress classification systems are lousy tables of contents to the realms of knowledge. If they were any good, then we would be memorizing at least the general categories. Try this:
Reality
Nature
Technology
Life
Society
Culture
Time

I guess that ends our discussion, then. Your commitment to rudeness makes it clear that this won't be a productive interchange.

I am not going to miss you. if you were what you claim to be, then you would recognize that what I stated was not personal. Your statement is held by a lot of other people, and you know it, because you did not devise it by yourself - you heard it from others. It is a common complaint, and political science has not solved the problem described in the complaint.

You are another of the forum's oligarchy trolls.

If he really wanted intelligent conversation, he wouldn't be trolling.

You are another of the forum's oligarchy trolls.

You have to possess some modicum of intelligence in order to truly desire intelligent discourse. I see no signs from this loon.

You are another of the forum's oligarchy trolls.

Anyone for an over/under date?

You are another of the forum's oligarchy trolls.

Ah, I see, we've got one of those jackasses who hasn't thought their pet idea through and can't answer the most basic questions about it.  As though the cracking and packing of power centers hasn't been tried six ways to sunday, most notably in context by the very ruling classes we're supposed to be outmaneuvering through the harebrained complication of bureaucracy.  

No matter how far I advance my idea, it will still have to go through a review process - a graduated series of constitutional conventions. What I have presented so far is more than enough to obligate law and political science scholars into such discussions. You have nothing. Just some slick rhetorical device that you cannot prove, much less devise a solution. Quit jerking-off and do the work.

The correct adjustment has already been devised: direct democracy with universal suffrage. 

You, as well. Quit jerking-off, and devise the charter system for a direct democracy with universal suffrage, because nobody else is; and if you can do it, then you will be awarded handsomely - stupid.

I wasn't replying to you, you stupid fuck.