I've heard two different versions of 'Kamala Harris actually won the election by a wide margin' recently, one says the leaker is a CIA agent and the other says it was an NSA agent, both claim the relevant agencies 'audited the election'. I don't have any first-hand knowledge of the CIA but auditing elections isn't something the NSA does. The NSA would have been involved in investigating cyberattacks on the election but they wouldn't be the ones to determine if such an attack altered the outcome of the election. The fact that there are two versions out there in the first place is very suspicious.
I'm not anti-Christian. I'm anti-stupid.
