(July 9, 2009 at 1:36 am)Arcanus Wrote: To conclude that someone is unable to respond based on the fact that they refuse to respond is non-sequitur. It just doesn't follow.I didn't say mean he was unable, I said that he is far too arrogant to admit when he is wrong. The words "your apparent inability" were meant as a jab, nothing else. It was a thinly veiled insult designed to either get him to actually participate in a discussion on (heaven forbid) a discussion forum, or to admit that he cannot come up with any rebuttals because I am right.
Twice he has now refused to say why my points are "wrong", citing that he just doesn't want to respond. That might absolve him in some people's minds, but not in mine.
