The Issue of Indoctrination

[BrianSoddingBoru4]

Hı, The first paragraph was supposed to be:
 

Two days ago I had a chat with this guy on a particularly dramatic subject which is the issue of the IRI regime committing genocide against its own people. I won’t go into the details, but I didn’t even bother to try to convince this guy on the obvious issue that the IRI is a murderous and tyrannical regime. That’s because I know that when you indoctrinate someone or impose some conclusion on this person these ideas will become like permanent implants inside their minds. And when you indoctrinate someone like this:

 
- It’s my wireless keyboard. It skips entire phrases sometimes
 
/ No what I am saying is that indoctrination was a necessity in the past. And it still is in some parts of the world. Today 1 in 10 men are illiterate and 1 in 5 women are illiterate. So this indoctrination thing is a thing of the past for “normal” people like us. But how do you expect someone to teach something to anyone in a remote village of Nigeria?
 
Also: The overall language of Holy Scriptures seems to be directed more to this kind of people then to people like us. We get to understand these scriptures too (if we invest the time to try to decipher the deeper meanings), but the overall language seems to be a millennia-old or so. And that’s why people get bored and end up deciding that all of it is gibberish.
 
So I’m only saying that expectations must be higher if the sum of capacities are much higher.

That reply has nothing to do with the history of pedagogy. Also, indoctrination has nothing to do with literacy rates.

Boru