What do people think of my stipulative definition of defining a pleasure as an experience worth having for its own sake?
I am happy for people to accept or reject that definition, because I think that someone could reject it and we still might not disagree substantively.
So then, what is the nature of pleasure?
I am happy for people to accept or reject that definition, because I think that someone could reject it and we still might not disagree substantively.
So then, what is the nature of pleasure?
Schopenhauer Wrote:The intellect has become free, and in this state it does not even know or understand any other interest than that of truth.
Epicurus Wrote:The greatest reward of righteousness is peace of mind.
Epicurus Wrote:Don't fear god,
Don't worry about death;
What is good is easy to get,
What is terrible is easy to endure
