(March 25, 2026 at 7:05 pm)The Grand Nudger Wrote: Thus "there is no such thing as mind independence, therefore realism is false" - as you understand it...does not even follow - regardless of whether what realism is talking about actually exists. It's not talking about the thing you think it is, the absence of that thing is not indicative of realisms failure.
However, do you think it's possible that the referenced harm to animals and the environment is not an illusion or artifact of the human mind?
When did I write that only the human mind may consider morality?
