RE: Natural Selection Seems Insufficient
Today at 9:31 am
(This post was last modified: Today at 9:41 am by Angrboda.)
(Today at 9:18 am)Jal Wrote:(Today at 9:13 am)Angrboda Wrote: Will such a theory withstand falsification? No. See this stems from your misunderstanding the nature of science. Science attempts to show that things are wrong, not simply confirm that they are right. It is your general tendency to accept confirmatory evidence for your beliefs as a strong indicator of truth. This is confirmation bias and is known to lead to a lot of false positives. Karl Popper explored why this is not a good approach to knowledge in the twentieth century but I'm sure you've never read Popper because you read shit like creationist drivel and bogus natural theology arguments. Your reading such has just made you stupid and ignorant.The apostle Paul said that demons proliferate in the atmosphere. You didn't know that demons are drawn to elevations?
I take my pot of water up a mountain and it boils at a lower temperature. Demon theory falsified.
This is what's known as an ad hoc assumption and points to a weakness in the theory. If you can show that the alternative thermodynamic explanation also relies on ad hos assumptions, then you would have a point. Instead you've just made your explanation worse instead of better, as now you have increased the complexity without increasing the explanatory power.
But no matter, I can create similar conditions at sea level, thus illustrating that your theory about demons liking elevations doesn't explain the phenomenon, and your theory is once again falsified. By pumping the air out of a chamber I can lower the boiling point without raising the elevation. What is your next ad hoc assumption going to be, where you, like an idiot, make the case for your theory worse instead of better? Regardless of where you suggest demons are more or less prevalent, I can create the condition where if your theory were true, we would expect water to boil or not boil and yet under controlled conditions your theory with its ad hoc assumptions fails. This is because you think it's easy to prove or disprove something, but when your ability is put to the test, it just reveals that you are mistaken.
![[Image: extraordinarywoo-sig.jpg]](https://i.postimg.cc/zf86M5L7/extraordinarywoo-sig.jpg)



![[Image: Screenshot-2026-09-07-at-08-07-41-what-i...a-body.png]](https://i.postimg.cc/8c2YhZGq/Screenshot-2026-09-07-at-08-07-41-what-is-the-name-of-a-body.png)