Married to a Christian

[tackattack]

If your standard is for naturally impossible I have nothing I can give you from personal experience. However what about someone who can see without pupils, bodies that don't decay or statues that bleed, cry and sweat?

I am a glutton for punishment, aren't I? Go on, let's see it. Even IF true (which I doubt), none would be proof of a God, just of something pretty weird.

Really, we're going to go through all those motions for no reasons, and with that kind of bias. You have google, if you want evidence it's for you to find, I'm not feeding you anything especially if you don't want it in the first place. You are correct though in that miracles, if veried to an acceptable level would only be proof of miracles, not of God. Does no good for me in proving my particular god, but would invalidate a substance monist, until they found a way to call the supranatural natural.

The problems I have with that are that then I either am delusional, a liar or have no evidence.

By George, I think you've got it.

Really min, you can be quite an ass sometimes. You know I did leave out a fourth possibility, that you deny presented evidence, but I was trying to be nice. Thanks for the consistency.