In conclusion:
Here's the breakdown of the Trilemma:
1. Start with the desired conclusion
2. Assume Jesus really existed
3. Assume that we have infallible records of this person., his life and what he claimed
4. Speculate two alternatives: liar and lunatic
5. Strawman the hell out of those alternatives (reducto ad absurdum)
6. Arrive at desired conclusion
7. Pay no attention to the man behind the curtain
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YWyCCJ6B2WE
Here's the breakdown of the Trilemma:
1. Start with the desired conclusion
2. Assume Jesus really existed
3. Assume that we have infallible records of this person., his life and what he claimed
4. Speculate two alternatives: liar and lunatic
5. Strawman the hell out of those alternatives (reducto ad absurdum)
6. Arrive at desired conclusion
7. Pay no attention to the man behind the curtain
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YWyCCJ6B2WE
Atheist Forums Hall of Shame:
"The trinity can be equated to having your cake and eating it too."
... -Lucent, trying to defend the Trinity concept
"(Yahweh's) actions are good because (Yahweh) is the ultimate standard of goodness. That’s not begging the question"
... -Statler Waldorf, Christian apologist
"The trinity can be equated to having your cake and eating it too."
... -Lucent, trying to defend the Trinity concept
"(Yahweh's) actions are good because (Yahweh) is the ultimate standard of goodness. That’s not begging the question"
... -Statler Waldorf, Christian apologist
