No. Doubt is rational when there's no evidence that a negative can be disproved absolutely!
I can't be absolutely the FSM doesn't exist , only almost certain (as with God), because I'm also almost certain that it cant be absolutely disproved (because that's fallacious (I'm almost certain of
), so knowing this - knowing this possibility that it could possibility exist because it isn't (and can't be) disproved - I'm only almost certain of the FSM, as well as God.
And with either God or the FSM or whatever...because it's illogical to be absolutely certain that they absolutely don't exist because you can't disprove them, it's a fallacy - so no, logical fallacies are not more logical simply by being 'more certain'.
It's the logic that makes the logic logical...not the certainty in the logic!
If I'm 100% certain that the FSM exists that doesn't make it any more likely that I'm right, right? And being absolutely certain about it and claiming it definitely exists - if anything just shows how illogical I am about it for claiming to know what I cannot know, right?
The logic is what matters...when it comes to logic (itself)! Not the certainty in such 'logic' (whether it's actually 'logical logic' or not).
EvF
I can't be absolutely the FSM doesn't exist , only almost certain (as with God), because I'm also almost certain that it cant be absolutely disproved (because that's fallacious (I'm almost certain of
), so knowing this - knowing this possibility that it could possibility exist because it isn't (and can't be) disproved - I'm only almost certain of the FSM, as well as God.And with either God or the FSM or whatever...because it's illogical to be absolutely certain that they absolutely don't exist because you can't disprove them, it's a fallacy - so no, logical fallacies are not more logical simply by being 'more certain'.
It's the logic that makes the logic logical...not the certainty in the logic!
If I'm 100% certain that the FSM exists that doesn't make it any more likely that I'm right, right? And being absolutely certain about it and claiming it definitely exists - if anything just shows how illogical I am about it for claiming to know what I cannot know, right?
The logic is what matters...when it comes to logic (itself)! Not the certainty in such 'logic' (whether it's actually 'logical logic' or not).
EvF
