RE: The Tel Dan Inscription
January 26, 2012 at 7:21 pm
(This post was last modified: January 26, 2012 at 7:22 pm by Oldandeasilyconfused.)
Quote: perhaps it is even worse than that? Perhaps they are simply making shit up to illustrate a point?
Indeed.I'm thinking specifically of Seutonius' "Life Of Caligula" which is perhaps the most important source for the popular view of Caligula. Historian Anthony A Barrett* calls the book 'scurillous', apparently a not uncommon view even at the time.
Of course Gibbon is also highly judgemental and reinforces the mythology of the 'good' and 'bad' emperors.
*CALIGULA: The Corruption Of Power" Anthony A Barrett, B T Batsford,London,1989
Kind of puts the writing of sacred books in a rational context,don't it.
![Tiger Tiger](https://atheistforums.org/images/smilies/tiger.gif)