Adrian,
They could totally exist AND yield no evidence if they were both invisible and pink. And so this is not just a total troll post...
FT,
Your argument about the big bang is one from incredulity i.e., "Nothing couldn't just suddenly become something, therefore there must have been a god." As Adrian points out, there is no way we can really know what happened so why place god there as an explaination when nothing works just as well.
Personally I think the beginning of the universe is the mootest of points because no hypothesis is testable and no matter what the reality is, the fact remains that we are here.
I just want to see some manifestation of God's existence and then I would be happy to believe.
Rhizo
They could totally exist AND yield no evidence if they were both invisible and pink. And so this is not just a total troll post...
FT,
Your argument about the big bang is one from incredulity i.e., "Nothing couldn't just suddenly become something, therefore there must have been a god." As Adrian points out, there is no way we can really know what happened so why place god there as an explaination when nothing works just as well.
Personally I think the beginning of the universe is the mootest of points because no hypothesis is testable and no matter what the reality is, the fact remains that we are here.
I just want to see some manifestation of God's existence and then I would be happy to believe.
Rhizo
