9/11 Truthers

[LEDO]

Two identical buildings, two identical plane crashes, two identical results. Doesn't require faith.

That statement in untrue. There can not be two identical plane crashes, and we know for a fact that the two buildings were hit in distinctively different ways. No one has talked about the third building, the pictures of cut supports, the liquid metal pouring out of the tower before it collapsed... The bigger picture...

To Adrian, I give as much credit to 9/11 debunkers as I do to 9/11 truthers. Well, almost as much credit. It is all hearsay about a very complex and confusing event. I don't want to read other peoples raving bias, and then consider myself learned. And I mean that one way or another, 9/11 truth, or 9/11-happened-like-we-have-been-told... I try to come to my own conclusions, as I think it is more valuable.

And remember, I only try to make claims I can support. If you read the official 9/11 Omission Report, you will see that it is not possible for that to be the real story. Literally not possible. So by stating that we are being lied to, and leaving it at that, I feel I cannot possibly be wrong. I have a bunch of ideas about what could have happened, and about what I think did not happen... But those are ideas, theories...
It's the Lucitania. Or the USS Cole. And what was that one we let the isrealies shoot up? Within history, 9/11 fits right in its place.

-Pip

I read the 911 report. There was nothing in it to suggest otherwise. The report was mostly blame sharing. The buildings were both struck by 747's into the side of the building. Both buildings began their collaspe at the point of impact. If explosives were used the would of had to have been placed at or near the floor of impact, and fused to detonate at a certain temperature and...why the fuck am I allowing myself to be dragged into this stupid discussion?