Wrong. We have the scientific method which provides reliable sources of evidence. Honestly, if you want to have beliefs without proof, that's fine. But it's beyond me when people who admit they lack evidence for their beliefs and still try to argue them. It's completely absurd.
You have to try to avoid argument? What the hell are you doing here then? Srsly, all we do is argue here, and that doesn't mean we hate each other.
As for 9/11 there is substantial evidence for that it was a terrorist attack and not an inside job. Adrian has provided a wealth of information, scientific information, not ideas or hearsay which you seem to think everything is. (Do you even know what hearsay is?). If you can't refute the arguments, then yeah, your arguments amount to nothing.
You have to try to avoid argument? What the hell are you doing here then? Srsly, all we do is argue here, and that doesn't mean we hate each other.
As for 9/11 there is substantial evidence for that it was a terrorist attack and not an inside job. Adrian has provided a wealth of information, scientific information, not ideas or hearsay which you seem to think everything is. (Do you even know what hearsay is?). If you can't refute the arguments, then yeah, your arguments amount to nothing.
"The way to see by faith is to shut the eye of reason." Benjamin Franklin
::Blogs:: Boston Atheism Examiner - Boston Atheists Blog | :
odcast:: Boston Atheists Report
::Blogs:: Boston Atheism Examiner - Boston Atheists Blog | :
odcast:: Boston Atheists Report