RE: Nature
February 17, 2012 at 2:25 am
(This post was last modified: February 17, 2012 at 2:28 am by Justtristo.)
(February 16, 2012 at 9:53 pm)Phil Wrote:(February 16, 2012 at 9:49 pm)Justtristo Wrote: There was a time when the complexity of lifeforms was a quite plausible argument for the existence of a creator. However after the publication of the Origin of the Species it ceased to be a legitimate argument for the existence of a creator. Since the Origin of the Species outlined a plausible and scientifically supported explanation for the complexity of lifeforms.Just a nitpick....MISUNDERSTAND not understand.
Those who still use this argument are either ignorant of evolution by natural selection or they understand it, thereby are being dishonest and hypocritical.
I tend to put the misunderstanding into the ignorance bit myself.
(February 17, 2012 at 12:53 am)brotherlylove Wrote:(February 16, 2012 at 11:27 pm)Zen Badger Wrote: At BL, how old do you think the universe is?
I believe it is young. I used to believe in an old age of the Earth/Universe but after investigating the evidence I changed my mind.
I am interested how after investigating the evidence you came to believe the Universe is relatively quite young?
undefined