But it is a newer form of hearsay. It might not be the right word entirely, but it gets the point across. That I did not take those pictures, and the ease of creating or modifying those pictures leads me to be skeptical of it's absolute truth.
I am a natural skeptic, something I am not allowed to be unless I am an atheist. You guys also took the term free thinker, of which I also most surely am.
Notice that I am not posting links of other peoples work trying to "prove" my theory on 9/11? Because I don't base my ideas on other peoples work. I make up my own mind. You guys can post all the myth busting that you want, but to me it is a waste of time.
I don't give everything (or much) on 9/11truth.com credit. Therefor, I should also not give everything on 9/11myths.com credit either. They both have an agenda, and could be lying.
I am not outsourcing my opinions and then claiming pictures on the internet as solid, unquestionable truth. I think you guys need a stronger definition of truth, because that is pretty flimsy. You are acting in the way that truthers get slammed for. Just taking it all in and spitting it all out without any skepticism. That you are on the other side of the argument does not justify that.
Like I said before, lets discuss American foreign policy, American middle eastern policy, Israel, history, the people in charge at that time... That seems more full and reliable than pics on the net.
Try to make an actual point, not just post borrowed material from the web.
Thanks,
-Pip
I am a natural skeptic, something I am not allowed to be unless I am an atheist. You guys also took the term free thinker, of which I also most surely am.
Notice that I am not posting links of other peoples work trying to "prove" my theory on 9/11? Because I don't base my ideas on other peoples work. I make up my own mind. You guys can post all the myth busting that you want, but to me it is a waste of time.
I don't give everything (or much) on 9/11truth.com credit. Therefor, I should also not give everything on 9/11myths.com credit either. They both have an agenda, and could be lying.
I am not outsourcing my opinions and then claiming pictures on the internet as solid, unquestionable truth. I think you guys need a stronger definition of truth, because that is pretty flimsy. You are acting in the way that truthers get slammed for. Just taking it all in and spitting it all out without any skepticism. That you are on the other side of the argument does not justify that.
Like I said before, lets discuss American foreign policy, American middle eastern policy, Israel, history, the people in charge at that time... That seems more full and reliable than pics on the net.
Try to make an actual point, not just post borrowed material from the web.
Thanks,
-Pip
