Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: January 28, 2025, 11:06 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
The 'have', 'of' mixup...
#3
RE: The 'have', 'of' mixup...
I think it arose out of laziness. Here in south Texas it's been reduced to coulda, woulda, & shoulda. All three brazenly spitting in the face of correct use of the English language. However, this is how language evolves and changes over time. There may come a point in time where could of may replace or be seen as equal to could have in its usage. Just as some popular slang makes it into respected dictionaries such may also be the case with these linguistic anomalies.

I can't say that I'm immune from such abuse of the language either. However, such instances do become a bit worrisome when something is stated or written correctly according to the rules of the language and an entire classroom of students tell you, "that don't sound right. It just sounds weird".
Reply



Messages In This Thread
The 'have', 'of' mixup... - by Edwardo Piet - October 19, 2008 at 8:18 pm
RE: The 'have', 'of' mixup... - by Rob - October 19, 2008 at 8:37 pm
RE: The 'have', 'of' mixup... - by solidsquid - October 19, 2008 at 10:18 pm
RE: The 'have', 'of' mixup... - by Edwardo Piet - October 20, 2008 at 12:13 pm
RE: The 'have', 'of' mixup... - by Kyuuketsuki - October 22, 2008 at 6:58 am
RE: The 'have', 'of' mixup... - by Edwardo Piet - October 22, 2008 at 9:15 pm
RE: The 'have', 'of' mixup... - by Kyuuketsuki - October 23, 2008 at 5:03 am
RE: The 'have', 'of' mixup... - by Edwardo Piet - October 23, 2008 at 12:15 pm

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Have you ever tried to debate Christians that have no clue? Dean-o 39 10021 June 22, 2011 at 10:41 pm
Last Post: tackattack



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)