RE: Psalm 137:9
March 4, 2012 at 9:47 pm
(This post was last modified: March 4, 2012 at 9:48 pm by Forsaken.)
(March 4, 2012 at 9:10 pm)ThomM Wrote:
This has been discussed at length and the apologetics consider every evidence available to refute the great flood and other biblical accounts as post flood "evidence". Apparently, all dating methods, such as;
Acanthochronology
Amino acid dating
Appearance Event Ordination
Astronomical chronology
Biochronology
Dendrochronology
Fluorine absorption dating
Herbchronology
Historic paint analysis
Law of superposition
Marine isotope stage
Obsidian hydration dating
Optical dating
Optically stimulated luminescence
Orbital tuning
Oxidizable carbon ratio dating
Principle of faunal succession
Rehydroxylation dating
Skeletochronology
Thermoluminescence dating
Typology
Varnish microlamination
etc..
on one side are considered as fake science by apologetics/creationists since they all come to almost the same conclusion on the age of a particular item; with a few degrees of error.