RE: Homosexuality
August 7, 2009 at 10:20 am
(This post was last modified: August 7, 2009 at 10:43 am by Anto Kennedy.)
Quote:So Auto... if lesbian sex was the first form of sex.
Quote:PS, i may have gotten one of the particulars wrong with my story above
Obviously.
(August 7, 2009 at 8:48 am)Dotard Wrote: Sounds like you are a trisexual. You'll try anything.
If you are aroused by gay porn and can 'make yourself' enjoy knobbing a cob, guess what? You are a homo.
You kinda contradicted yourself there. One minute I'm a trisexual, the next a homo.
Beside I'm not a trisexual, just because my dick will get aroused by pretty much any stimuli visual, audio or sensual doesn't mean I'll indulge. Self-control, personal choice. But who needs that when you can just blame it all on your genes and take away any personal responsibility. "Gays are victims" is what the scientific community is saying now, but it's bull.
Quote:Nature has an interesting way of fluking... but perhaps a little story might help you understand why being sexually attracted to one's particular sex is genetic.
I never said it wasn't. I said a homosexual lifestyle is unnatural. The individual chooses to suck dick for life. The only thing that may be genetic is sexual orientation, and it's only an orientation, it doesn't turn you into a fag, that behaviour is learned.
Quote:You sir are an ignorant,irrational
You sir? What is this? A fecking duel on the Orient Express?
So....any evidence that homosexuality is genetic in the females of the species...or any species for that matter?
Quote:Although female homosexuality has appeared in many cultures throughout time, not until recently has lesbian described a group of people. In the late 19th century, sexologists published their observations on same-sex desire and behavior, and designated lesbians in Western culture as a distinct entity. As as a result, women who became aware of their new medical status formed underground subcultures in Europe and North America.
And there it is, a sociological phenomena.
Quote:Lesbians in Western cultures in particular often classify themselves as having an identity that defines their individual sexuality, as well as their membership to a group that shares common traits.
It might as well be a sports team fan club, only with shared sexual preferences as the team they support.
Quote:As women have generally been political minorities in Western cultures, the added medical designation of homosexuality has been cause for the development of a subcultural identity.
Know what else is a sub-cultural identity?
![[Image: larp.jpg]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=www.wired.com%2Fimages_blogs%2Fgeekdad%2Fimages%2F2009%2F03%2F29%2Flarp.jpg)
Quote:Other women, however, embraced the distinction and used their uniqueness to set themselves apart from heterosexual women and gay men.
It's basically a no-boys allowed club for "grown ups".
Quote:In the United States, the 1920s was a decade of social experimentation, particularly with sex. This was heavily influenced by the writings of Sigmund Freud, who theorized that people would behave in any manner to satisfy sexual desire. Freud's theories were much more pervasive in the U.S. than in Europe. With the well-publicized notion that sexual acts were a part of lesbianism and their relationships, sexual experimentation was widespread. Large cities that provided a nightlife were immensely popular, and women began to seek out sexual adventure. Bisexuality became chic, particularly in America's first gay neighborhoods.
Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm.............
I think I see a pattern....an academic, rightly or wrongly (usually wrongly), has a particularly permissive view on a sex, and before you know it the masses have taken that to mean they can do whatever they hell they like.....and they act as if it has always been that way.
If no academic had ever mentioned the word gay or lesbian, there would be no gays or lesbians in Western society. You'd have a small minority engaging in homosexual behaviours on-and-off, harmless. But you almost certainly would not have had the situation where a 14 year old declares themselves gay because they read in a science textbook that, "some men like women, other men like men, this is natural"
You guys act like the consenus view of homosexuality is the absolute truth and cannot be challenged. Our current understanding of human sexuality is woefully inadequate. (Our whole understanding of mind & identity is inadequate)