Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: January 12, 2025, 2:14 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
'Intelligent' design?
#58
RE: 'Intelligent' design?
(March 11, 2012 at 11:28 pm)black36 Wrote: So, you want me to believe that opposing reproductive organs magically appeared, which work together perfectly, in the same place, at the same time, in distinctly different organisms, who suddenly had the desire and the know how as to how to use said organs, then they were successfully used, survived and continued to survive, despite there being no environmental factor which would cause such phenomena, nor mutation which is even mathematically possible to produce opposing organs which work perfectly????????

ROFLOL

So therefore Jesus?

Would it be equally acceptable to you if I suggested that since I was unaware of WHY the tides went in and went out, that therefore sea spirits exist to move them?
Reply



Messages In This Thread
'Intelligent' design? - by Rokcet Scientist - March 11, 2012 at 12:09 am
RE: 'Intelligent' design? - by Welsh cake - March 11, 2012 at 5:15 am
RE: 'Intelligent' design? - by Forsaken - March 11, 2012 at 5:32 am
RE: 'Intelligent' design? - by Welsh cake - March 11, 2012 at 6:33 am
RE: 'Intelligent' design? - by Phil - March 11, 2012 at 7:18 am
RE: 'Intelligent' design? - by Welsh cake - March 11, 2012 at 12:24 pm
RE: 'Intelligent' design? - by The Grand Nudger - March 11, 2012 at 12:27 pm
RE: 'Intelligent' design? - by LastPoet - March 11, 2012 at 12:44 pm
RE: 'Intelligent' design? - by LEDO - March 11, 2012 at 8:17 pm
RE: 'Intelligent' design? - by The Grand Nudger - March 11, 2012 at 8:19 pm
RE: 'Intelligent' design? - by Phil - March 11, 2012 at 8:44 pm
RE: 'Intelligent' design? - by Nine - March 11, 2012 at 8:46 pm
RE: 'Intelligent' design? - by The Grand Nudger - March 11, 2012 at 9:01 pm
RE: 'Intelligent' design? - by black36 - March 11, 2012 at 9:39 pm
RE: 'Intelligent' design? - by The Grand Nudger - March 11, 2012 at 9:43 pm
RE: 'Intelligent' design? - by black36 - March 11, 2012 at 9:46 pm
RE: 'Intelligent' design? - by Nine - March 11, 2012 at 9:50 pm
RE: 'Intelligent' design? - by black36 - March 11, 2012 at 9:52 pm
RE: 'Intelligent' design? - by Nine - March 11, 2012 at 9:53 pm
RE: 'Intelligent' design? - by black36 - March 11, 2012 at 9:55 pm
RE: 'Intelligent' design? - by Nine - March 11, 2012 at 9:57 pm
RE: 'Intelligent' design? - by Phil - March 12, 2012 at 8:08 am
RE: 'Intelligent' design? - by The Grand Nudger - March 11, 2012 at 9:48 pm
RE: 'Intelligent' design? - by black36 - March 11, 2012 at 9:51 pm
RE: 'Intelligent' design? - by Nine - March 11, 2012 at 9:52 pm
RE: 'Intelligent' design? - by The Grand Nudger - March 11, 2012 at 9:52 pm
RE: 'Intelligent' design? - by The Grand Nudger - March 11, 2012 at 9:56 pm
RE: 'Intelligent' design? - by black36 - March 11, 2012 at 10:07 pm
RE: 'Intelligent' design? - by The Grand Nudger - March 11, 2012 at 10:10 pm
RE: 'Intelligent' design? - by Nine - March 11, 2012 at 10:16 pm
RE: 'Intelligent' design? - by The Grand Nudger - March 11, 2012 at 10:29 pm
RE: 'Intelligent' design? - by black36 - March 11, 2012 at 10:29 pm
RE: 'Intelligent' design? - by Nine - March 11, 2012 at 10:36 pm
RE: 'Intelligent' design? - by black36 - March 11, 2012 at 10:42 pm
RE: 'Intelligent' design? - by The Grand Nudger - March 11, 2012 at 10:31 pm
RE: 'Intelligent' design? - by The Grand Nudger - March 11, 2012 at 10:38 pm
RE: 'Intelligent' design? - by Nine - March 11, 2012 at 10:39 pm
RE: 'Intelligent' design? - by black36 - March 11, 2012 at 10:38 pm
RE: 'Intelligent' design? - by The Grand Nudger - March 11, 2012 at 10:39 pm
RE: 'Intelligent' design? - by Nine - March 11, 2012 at 10:45 pm
RE: 'Intelligent' design? - by black36 - March 11, 2012 at 10:49 pm
RE: 'Intelligent' design? - by Nine - March 11, 2012 at 10:59 pm
RE: 'Intelligent' design? - by black36 - March 11, 2012 at 11:10 pm
RE: 'Intelligent' design? - by frankiej - March 11, 2012 at 11:15 pm
RE: 'Intelligent' design? - by Nine - March 11, 2012 at 11:17 pm
RE: 'Intelligent' design? - by black36 - March 11, 2012 at 11:28 pm
RE: 'Intelligent' design? - by Nine - March 11, 2012 at 11:44 pm
RE: 'Intelligent' design? - by reverendjeremiah - March 12, 2012 at 2:07 am
RE: 'Intelligent' design? - by Phil - March 12, 2012 at 8:15 am
RE: 'Intelligent' design? - by The Grand Nudger - March 11, 2012 at 10:46 pm
RE: 'Intelligent' design? - by Nine - March 11, 2012 at 10:47 pm
RE: 'Intelligent' design? - by black36 - March 11, 2012 at 10:51 pm
RE: 'Intelligent' design? - by Minimalist - March 11, 2012 at 10:49 pm
RE: 'Intelligent' design? - by The Grand Nudger - March 11, 2012 at 10:50 pm
RE: 'Intelligent' design? - by The Grand Nudger - March 11, 2012 at 10:54 pm
RE: 'Intelligent' design? - by black36 - March 11, 2012 at 10:55 pm
RE: 'Intelligent' design? - by The Grand Nudger - March 11, 2012 at 10:57 pm
RE: 'Intelligent' design? - by black36 - March 11, 2012 at 11:00 pm
RE: 'Intelligent' design? - by Nine - March 11, 2012 at 11:03 pm
RE: 'Intelligent' design? - by Minimalist - March 12, 2012 at 1:33 am
RE: 'Intelligent' design? - by padraic - March 12, 2012 at 4:27 am
RE: 'Intelligent' design? - by Rokcet Scientist - March 12, 2012 at 2:23 am
RE: 'Intelligent' design? - by Minimalist - March 12, 2012 at 3:04 am
RE: 'Intelligent' design? - by The Grand Nudger - March 12, 2012 at 8:13 am
RE: 'Intelligent' design? - by Faith No More - March 12, 2012 at 8:16 am
RE: 'Intelligent' design? - by Phil - March 12, 2012 at 8:20 am
RE: 'Intelligent' design? - by Faith No More - March 12, 2012 at 8:21 am
RE: 'Intelligent' design? - by Phil - March 12, 2012 at 8:33 am
RE: 'Intelligent' design? - by The Grand Nudger - March 12, 2012 at 8:38 am
RE: 'Intelligent' design? - by Phil - March 12, 2012 at 9:52 am
RE: 'Intelligent' design? - by Phil - March 12, 2012 at 10:19 am
RE: 'Intelligent' design? - by The Grand Nudger - March 12, 2012 at 10:04 am
RE: 'Intelligent' design? - by Phil - March 12, 2012 at 10:10 am
RE: 'Intelligent' design? - by NoMoreFaith - March 12, 2012 at 10:12 am
RE: 'Intelligent' design? - by The Grand Nudger - March 12, 2012 at 10:14 am
RE: 'Intelligent' design? - by Phil - March 12, 2012 at 10:24 am
RE: 'Intelligent' design? - by The Grand Nudger - March 12, 2012 at 10:24 am
RE: 'Intelligent' design? - by The Grand Nudger - March 12, 2012 at 10:31 am
RE: 'Intelligent' design? - by Phil - March 12, 2012 at 10:36 am
RE: 'Intelligent' design? - by The Grand Nudger - March 12, 2012 at 10:39 am

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Intelligent Falling Dundee 9 1825 October 5, 2020 at 1:41 am
Last Post: Anomalocaris
  A Working Draft Design Argument Acrobat 54 7340 October 19, 2019 at 10:28 am
Last Post: Pat Mustard
  Intelligent Design (brief overview). Mystic 70 15527 May 9, 2018 at 2:17 pm
Last Post: Gawdzilla Sama
  Intelligent (?) Design Minimalist 12 4776 August 21, 2017 at 1:23 am
Last Post: Minimalist
  If God of Abraham is true, then why didnt he use his intelligent design to make a new Roeki 129 51280 July 9, 2017 at 2:11 am
Last Post: Astonished
  Finely-tuned universe wanted: Intelligent Designers need not apply. Time Traveler 38 10455 April 11, 2016 at 9:01 pm
Last Post: Simon Moon
  The stupid "Apex" "design" argument..... Brian37 23 6638 March 4, 2016 at 11:32 am
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
Video Intelligent Design, The Designer is Drunk! Mental Outlaw 6 2403 March 15, 2015 at 6:24 pm
Last Post: robvalue
  Disbelief in an intelligent creator = far fetched? Silver 39 9251 January 12, 2015 at 10:07 am
Last Post: Nope
  Why intelligent design "proofs" are pointless robvalue 27 7089 September 13, 2014 at 4:14 pm
Last Post: fr0d0



Users browsing this thread: 9 Guest(s)