Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: February 22, 2025, 3:56 am

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Blunder by NAP?
#9
RE: Blunder by NAP?
It's a tossup whether the WBC would have known about the rally and showed up on their own anyway. I think they're probably just going to get themselves noticed in the news for one, and secondly hoping that some evil atheist pushes them around so that they can play the victim card and sue them. I'm hoping all atheists who attend there will be civil since there's nothing to be gained by attacking the WBC. They've done far more to promote atheism than any atheist could ever hope to do.
Christian apologetics is the art of rolling a dog turd in sugar and selling it as a donut.
Reply



Messages In This Thread
Blunder by NAP? - by thesummerqueen - March 16, 2012 at 9:33 am
RE: Blunder by NAP? - by The Grand Nudger - March 16, 2012 at 9:35 am
RE: Blunder by NAP? - by thesummerqueen - March 16, 2012 at 9:38 am
RE: Blunder by NAP? - by Jaysyn - March 16, 2012 at 9:43 am
RE: Blunder by NAP? - by Napoléon - March 16, 2012 at 11:05 am
RE: Blunder by NAP? - by thesummerqueen - March 16, 2012 at 11:10 am
RE: Blunder by NAP? - by Napoléon - March 16, 2012 at 12:04 pm
RE: Blunder by NAP? - by thesummerqueen - March 16, 2012 at 12:07 pm
RE: Blunder by NAP? - by Doubting Thomas - March 16, 2012 at 12:55 pm
RE: Blunder by NAP? - by Jaysyn - March 16, 2012 at 3:58 pm
RE: Blunder by NAP? - by The Grand Nudger - March 16, 2012 at 4:01 pm



Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)