RE: Evolution
March 20, 2012 at 4:24 pm
(This post was last modified: March 20, 2012 at 4:24 pm by Jackalope.)
(March 20, 2012 at 12:29 pm)Cthulhu Dreaming Wrote:(March 20, 2012 at 8:11 am)Hunter9035 Wrote: There are a lot of fallacies in Catholicism, I don't agree w a lot of things they do. I can't speak for their stance on this. And evolutionists theories will always have missing links and flawed carbon dating etc so I wouldn't call that much of anything let alone evidence.
"Flawed carbon dating"
We hear that claim frequently. The problem is, the claims always turn out to be false.
Care to post a few examples (with sources) so your claim can be properly discussed?
Yeah, didn't think so.
Luckily, our friends over at the talk.origins archive have done us all a favor and have looked into and have debunked commonly encountered creationist claims on the "flaws" of carbon dating (you really mean "radiometric dating", but that's a common mistake). Oh, and not just radiometric dating, but on a whole bunch of other shit too.
It turns out that in every case, the creationists were wrong, and in some cases were engaged in what appeared to be deliberate deception. The fact that creation "scientists" continue to make claims based on what's been demonstrated to be false only leads me to conclude that the deception is, in fact, deliberate.
You don't need to take my word for it, read the refutations and thier sources and find out what's really true. Either that, or you can continue to listen to whoever you've been listening to. By the way, they're lying to you.