RE: Evolution
March 21, 2012 at 2:10 pm
(This post was last modified: March 21, 2012 at 2:12 pm by NoMoreFaith.)
(March 20, 2012 at 4:52 pm)NoMoreFaith Wrote: It explains nothing unless you have evidence for existence.
Other, than that, it is surplus to requirement. Occams Razor prevails.
Just for the record Drich, I posted directly after the 'garden of eden' hypothesis you proposed.
First post and several after asking for evidence of your proposal Drich. You declined to offer any, so there is no point to debating it.
Now you claim nobody asked.
You may as well argue that faeries are compatible with evolution, because they were made in the seelie and unseelie kingdoms unreachable from this plane of existence.
As a proposal, this has equivalent theoretical status unless you can provide evidence for the existence of this garden of eden on earth.
You've been called out as a weasel who avoids the questions, and I call you out on it again.
Evidence or a faery gets it.
Sadly I know your sort, by using questions instead of proof, or even logic, you can remain in an imaginary offensive without justifying your self-authenticated illusions.
Self-authenticating private evidence is useless, because it is indistinguishable from the illusion of it. ― Kel, Kelosophy Blog
If you’re going to watch tele, you should watch Scooby Doo. That show was so cool because every time there’s a church with a ghoul, or a ghost in a school. They looked beneath the mask and what was inside?
The f**king janitor or the dude who runs the waterslide. Throughout history every mystery. Ever solved has turned out to be. Not Magic. ― Tim Minchin, Storm
If you’re going to watch tele, you should watch Scooby Doo. That show was so cool because every time there’s a church with a ghoul, or a ghost in a school. They looked beneath the mask and what was inside?
The f**king janitor or the dude who runs the waterslide. Throughout history every mystery. Ever solved has turned out to be. Not Magic. ― Tim Minchin, Storm
