(March 21, 2012 at 10:53 pm)Drich Wrote:
Why? So you can say that we're too narrow minded to accept the evidence you want to present. I have an open mind to whatever you wish to propose. Why is that not enough?
You're right, the conversation stops because you cannot provide evidence. No doubt about it there.
Weak attempts at reverse psychology do not concern me, or any others. The fact remains, there is no evidence of a garden of eden.
However, how about you just show us something that does not rely on the bible and take it from there. My suspicion is that it is impossible to do so, and you will try to avoid the request again.
Evidence should support a garden inaccessible from the rest of the world, which you may claim to be the garden of eden since using the source material to prove itself is clearly flawed.
Don't think I didn't notice you answered with a question again. Weasel.
Self-authenticating private evidence is useless, because it is indistinguishable from the illusion of it. ― Kel, Kelosophy Blog
If you’re going to watch tele, you should watch Scooby Doo. That show was so cool because every time there’s a church with a ghoul, or a ghost in a school. They looked beneath the mask and what was inside?
The f**king janitor or the dude who runs the waterslide. Throughout history every mystery. Ever solved has turned out to be. Not Magic. ― Tim Minchin, Storm
If you’re going to watch tele, you should watch Scooby Doo. That show was so cool because every time there’s a church with a ghoul, or a ghost in a school. They looked beneath the mask and what was inside?
The f**king janitor or the dude who runs the waterslide. Throughout history every mystery. Ever solved has turned out to be. Not Magic. ― Tim Minchin, Storm
